Letztes Update:
20201123145509
The current humanitarian system is structured to be reactive not responsive. This must change, the realities are complex; disasters start off in one way and can end looking quite different as another as we have seen recently with COVID-19 Animesh Kumar, UNDRR Deputy Chief, Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific 03:43
19.11.2020

Complement not compete

05:56
19.11.2020

Interesting exchanges at the end of the panel discussion, upon Raymond’s statement that there is a need for more advocacy to underline that funding for anticipatory action is not in competition with funding for response. Risk financing instruments should be complementary. Animesh Kumar from UNDRR responds: “It’s not competition at all, we are living in a world of scarce resources. And it is all about the optimal utilization of these resources.” He cites the growing humanitarian needs: “If you take just the figures from 2015-2022, the number of people in need has doubled and we have not been able to meet the requirements of humanitarian action for more than 50 percent.”

According to Animesh Kumar this shows the value of anticipatory action: “We do not have enough resources to keep having this vicious cycle of responding to a disaster once it has happened, hence it makes sense to invest more in anticipatory action and risk management so that we can prevent the disasters from happening in the future rather than waiting for the disaster to happen and making it so expensive to respond.”

Hilla Wessel

Animesh Kumar

03:48
19.11.2020
UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR) - Officer-in-Charge, Asia-Pacific Thailand

Duygu Bayramoglu

Let’s be clear that anticipatory action will not be feasible or applicable in every context. We must be clear that some risks won’t materialize in the life cycle of a contract. This is really important for us as a donor. Davide Zappa, ECHO Regional Office in Bangkok 03:35
19.11.2020